Sorry, you need to enable JavaScript to visit this website.
Search
hero

Analyzing If An Oncology Care Model Will Improve Care and Lower Costs

HIGHLIGHTS

  • Cancer strikes 1.6 million Americans each year, imposing huge costs
  • We’re evaluating an oncology care model that seeks to improve care and lower costs by linking payment to quality of care, improving delivery of care, and improving health information sharing
  • Evaluation results from the first two years of OCM will be available in mid-2019.

The Challenge

Cancer strikes 1.6 million Americans each year. It imposes huge costs: heartache, death, and an estimated $263.8 billion in medical care and lost productivity in 2010, the most recent data available. Cancer care is complex and improving it faces a legal barrier: health-information sharing can improve care, but data sharing could conflict with privacy rights.

The Approach

Under a contract with the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Abt Global is leading a team that uses a mixed-methods approach to evaluate an oncology care model (OCM) to improve care and lower costs. The model focuses on three main areas: linking payment to quality of care; improving delivery of care; and improving health information sharing while protecting privacy. The evaluation explores the characteristics of the oncology physician group practices that voluntarily participate in the OCM. The project uses a carefully constructed comparison group to measure whether changes over the five-year test are greater in intervention practices than in comparison practices –a difference-in-differences evaluation design. The evaluation focuses on several issues. How care delivery changes under the OCM. Which OCM design elements contribute most to success. Which contextual factors affect program success. And most important, the impact of the OCM on quality of care, health outcomes, utilization, and cost.

The mixed method design uses data from many sources, including Medicare administrative data systems, other CMS contractors implementing the OCM, applications completed by oncology physician group practices and other payers, case studies, and surveys completed by patients, clinicians, and oncology physician group practices practice leaders. We are conducting a mixed methods analysis of unintended consequences of OCM and factors influencing the potential scalability of the model. Rapid-cycle reporting provides CMS with quarterly updates on oncology physician group practices activities and summative outcomes.

The Results

About Abt's Health Policy Work

Reimagining the Emergency Medical System in the Wake of COVID: A Conversation with Dr. Paul Biddinger

We sat down with Dr. Paul Biddinger of MGH to discuss how emergency services changed during the COVID-19 pandemic and lessons learned for EMS and ED providers.

Learn More
Blog

Designing a TA Program: Lessons from the Medicaid IAP

This blog provides tips for setting up a successful technical assistance program based on the evaluation of the Medicaid Innovation Accelerator Program (IAP).

Learn More
Blog

Monitoring Medicare’s Home Health, Hospice, and Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Benefits

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ (CMS) home health, hospice, home infusion therapy, home IVIG, and IRF benefits require constant monitoring of payment policy—and revisions, as needed—to ensure they are working as intended. This enables…

Learn More
Project

Managing Opioid Use and Misuse in Older Adults

Older adults are twice as likely as the general population to have pain, and clinicians often rely on opioid treatment. As a result, opioid use, misuse, and opioid use disorder have increased among older adults, who are vulnerable to adverse reactions…

Learn More
Project